Binary Logic
By Jack Don McLovin - Multidiscplinarian -- Jack Has Been writing pages a day for the past 10 years under varying anonymous accounts, always drifting from place to place trying to gain popularity in a group, and start again, and repeat.
If Binary Logic were worth it's weight in gold it would make sense in natural language:
Can't not, isn't can, it's have to, or will, or must. "you can't not have a drink", means "you have to have a drink". Just as you can't write "or" as a binary without it already, because in natural language the or is more like "xor", and yet the alternative or is more like and/or and yet if we write it out it's "and or or", or in programming "and xor xor", which isn't the same.
One big issue with binary logic is that of quantum logic: where you can have both 1 and 0 and neither at the same time. Instead of 4 main operators there are 14. And yet the truths we use to discuss quantum logic are given in a linguistic binary. These truisms are either true or false. And yet if the written word itself were quantum in nature, then the logic of it's truths would follow suit.
But things get confusing for ape-man, so we have to keep things simple, which is another one of my criticisms which we'll get into later (Ockham's Razor).
